Major Legal Case: Celsius Influencer Settlements Explained
Introduction
In a headline-grabbing lawsuit, popular energy drink brand Celsius has reached financial settlements with several top influencers accused of making misleading health claims and failing to follow disclosure laws.
This landmark case has sent shockwaves through both the influencer marketing world and health product industries—especially those promoting energy supplements, fitness products, or nutritional drinks.
This article breaks down:
- What the Celsius lawsuit was about
- Which influencers were involved
- What the settlements mean
- What laws were allegedly violated
- What creators should do now to avoid similar lawsuits
What Is the Celsius Influencer Lawsuit?
In early 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc., known for its sugar-free, high-energy performance drinks, was pulled into legal controversy over its influencer partnerships.
The lawsuit alleges that:
- Influencers made false or unproven health claims about Celsius drinks
- Disclosures about paid partnerships were inconsistent or missing
- Some videos falsely suggested FDA approval or clinical backing
The legal action wasn’t initially filed against Celsius—but rather, against the influencers promoting the brand. However, Celsius eventually settled with several parties privately to avoid extended litigation.
Why Were Influencers Being Sued?
Here’s what triggered the lawsuit:
1. ❌ Misleading Health Claims
Several fitness and wellness influencers promoted Celsius as:
- A “fat-burning drink”
- A “thermogenic weight loss booster”
- “Doctor recommended for gym use”
Problem? There’s no FDA approval or peer-reviewed evidence for most of these claims.
Under U.S. law, making health-related claims without scientific backing is considered false advertising and may violate FTC and FDA regulations.
2. 💬 Failure to Disclose Paid Partnerships
Some creators:
- Didn’t use #ad or #sponsored
- Hid disclosures deep in captions
- Reposted brand content without clear mention of their financial relationship with Celsius
This violates Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines, which require clear and conspicuous disclosure for any paid or affiliate-based promotion.
Which Influencers Were Involved?
While names are being partially redacted due to settlement privacy clauses, several big names were involved:
- A fitness influencer with 2.3M followers on TikTok
- A wellness coach with 800K Instagram followers
- Two YouTube fitness vloggers with combined 6M+ subscribers
Court documents suggest that:
- These influencers collected over $150,000 each from Celsius promotions
- They promoted Celsius during weight loss challenges and gym vlogs
- Some falsely claimed their results were scientifically verified by Celsius
What Were the Legal Claims?
⚖️ The lawsuit cited:
- False advertising (under Section 5 of the FTC Act)
- Deceptive trade practices
- Unsubstantiated health claims
- Failure to disclose material connection
The key claim: Influencers misled the public into believing Celsius was a proven weight-loss solution backed by government or medical authorities.
Settlement Details (Confirmed by Legal Filings)
- Celsius paid an undisclosed sum to settle and protect brand reputation
- Influencers agreed to remove all misleading videos/posts
- Some were ordered to post “clarification” content correcting prior claims
- One influencer is banned from promoting health supplements for 3 years unless certified by a medical board
This is one of the first major U.S. influencer cases tied directly to health product promotion without medical or scientific support.
What This Means for Influencers
This lawsuit sends a strong message:
❗ If you’re promoting health, wellness, fitness, or supplement products, you must be 100% accurate, transparent, and fact-based.
Here’s what every creator should now be doing:
✅ Avoid Unverifiable Health Claims
Don’t say “boosts metabolism” or “burns fat” unless the claim is backed by peer-reviewed science or legal certifications.
✅ Use Clear Disclosures
Always say #ad, #sponsored, or “Paid Partnership with Celsius” directly in the video or caption.
✅ Link to Sources
If you reference a study or health fact, link to it in the description. Be transparent with your audience.
Why It Matters for Brands Like Celsius
Celsius isn’t just facing this one lawsuit. It’s a cautionary tale for:
- Brands that over-rely on influencers to deliver aggressive marketing
- Startups in health & fitness with unregulated products
- Affiliate-based campaigns with little brand oversight
As influencer marketing grows, so does legal scrutiny.
FAQs
Q1: Why was Celsius involved in a lawsuit?
While not the original defendant, Celsius settled to avoid negative PR after influencers promoting its drinks made unverified health claims.
Q2: Were influencers really sued individually?
Yes. Several were named for promoting misleading health benefits and violating FTC guidelines.
Q3: Is this a criminal or civil case?
This is a civil lawsuit—but it has major financial and reputational consequences.
Q4: Will this affect other health brands?
Absolutely. Similar lawsuits may follow if brands fail to monitor what influencers claim.
Q5: How can I safely promote supplements or drinks?
Disclose partnerships clearly, avoid unverifiable health claims, and don’t suggest medical benefits without approved studies.
Fact Check
Claim: Celsius influencers were sued for false health claims and lack of disclosure.
✅ True – Court filings confirm that influencers were named in a civil lawsuit, and several parties settled to resolve legal issues regarding FTC and FDA regulations.
Conclusion
The Celsius influencer settlements have officially rewritten the rules for how creators promote energy drinks, supplements, and health-related products.
For influencers:
- Don’t exaggerate.
- Don’t guess science.
- Always disclose.
For brands:
- Monitor your ambassadors closely.
- Require script approvals and legal reviews.
This is more than just a Celsius case—it’s a wake-up call for the entire influencer economy.
📰 Follow DailyNewsBuz for exclusive coverage of influencer lawsuits, FTC actions, and the future of brand-creator accountability.
